Comparison
Airdrop Finder vs Meta Silense TON
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @airdropfindteam | @tonmetasilense |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 2.3M | 2.7M |
| Avg views | 186,385 | 22,970 |
| Engagement rate | 8.0% | 0.8% |
| 30-day growth | -11.2% | -16.2% |
| Language | Français | Français |
| Category | crypto | fashion |
| Channel age | 1540 days | 1730 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@airdropfindteam
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@tonmetasilense
Questionable
- Views are low relative to subscribers — possibly an inactive or inflated audience
- Engagement swings sharply between snapshots — unstable reach
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.