Comparison
🇸🇱 APK 🇸🇱 vs APK
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @melbett_betwinner_1xbet_mostbet | @xparibet_dbbet_1khbetss_winwin |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 2M | 1.7M |
| Avg views | 159,342 | 138,147 |
| Engagement rate | 8.0% | 7.9% |
| 30-day growth | +0.8% | +9.4% |
| Language | Türkçe | Türkçe |
| Category | — | betting |
| Channel age | 740 days | 663 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@melbett_betwinner_1xbet_mostbet
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@xparibet_dbbet_1khbetss_winwin
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.